+- Rune2006 (http://rune2006.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Rune2006 (/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Game Discussion (/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: [FOR PLURAL] (/showthread.php?tid=2716)
RE: [FOR PLURAL] - xaviar - 03-04-2014 08:59 AM
Guise. Don't hayte on plural. Why would he update if the only people playing his game are a bunch of people complaining about him, atleast pretend to like him
RE: [FOR PLURAL] - Goku - 03-04-2014 10:22 AM
(03-04-2014 08:59 AM)xaviar Wrote: Guise. Don't hayte on plural. Why would he update if the only people playing his game are a bunch of people complaining about him, atleast pretend to like him
THIS HOLY SHIT.
but meh i mean i dont mean to be negative or anything but even if there were updates we probably still would have a really small player base \:
RE: [FOR PLURAL] - Remore5 - 03-04-2014 12:12 PM
I mean I've been on several servers these last few week and I found that I like this one the most, even with the stuff that isn't implemented. The community is great and it is still great to play it and relive the adventure and experience all of the nostalgia associated with it. It would be cool to see some updates, but as a former server owner I definitely understand, so I'm more than okay with the server as it is
RE: [FOR PLURAL] - Adventurer - 03-04-2014 06:27 PM
I would agree that updates only moderately would suffice, but not if remaining remote for months.
RE: [FOR PLURAL] - cojack - 03-04-2014 11:31 PM
I don't understand how this server hasn't thrived. It's a well stabled server but being out for a year with minimal progress made, it isn't much to be excited for.
RE: [FOR PLURAL] - Dri Comics - 03-05-2014 11:09 AM
(03-04-2014 11:31 PM)cojack Wrote: I don't understand how this server hasn't thrived. It's a well stabled server but being out for a year with minimal progress made, it isn't much to be excited for.
I can name 60 2006 remakes with at-least 10 quests coded in, and way more content.
RE: [FOR PLURAL] - dsun - 03-05-2014 11:28 AM
(03-05-2014 11:09 AM)Dri Comics Wrote:(03-04-2014 11:31 PM)cojack Wrote: I don't understand how this server hasn't thrived. It's a well stabled server but being out for a year with minimal progress made, it isn't much to be excited for.
I can name 60 2006 remakes with at-least 10 quests coded in, and way more content.
No, you can't.
RE: [FOR PLURAL] - garrett - 03-05-2014 11:37 AM
(03-05-2014 11:09 AM)Dri Comics Wrote:(03-04-2014 11:31 PM)cojack Wrote: I don't understand how this server hasn't thrived. It's a well stabled server but being out for a year with minimal progress made, it isn't much to be excited for.
I can name 60 2006 remakes with at-least 10 quests coded in, and way more content.
I can name one intolerable jackass who needs to get off the rune2006 forums...
RE: [FOR PLURAL] - Dri Comics - 03-05-2014 12:00 PM
(03-05-2014 11:37 AM)garrett Wrote:(03-05-2014 11:09 AM)Dri Comics Wrote:(03-04-2014 11:31 PM)cojack Wrote: I don't understand how this server hasn't thrived. It's a well stabled server but being out for a year with minimal progress made, it isn't much to be excited for.
I can name 60 2006 remakes with at-least 10 quests coded in, and way more content.
I can name one intolerable jackass who needs to get off the rune2006 forums...
I can also name 3 2006 remakes that closed down, and still manage to get in more votes than rune2006 on runelocus.
RE: [FOR PLURAL] - dsun - 03-05-2014 12:01 PM
(03-05-2014 12:00 PM)Dri Comics Wrote: I can also name 3 2006 remakes that closed down, and still manage to get in more votes than rune2006 on runelocus.
No, you can't.