+- Rune2006 (http://rune2006.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Other (/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Off-Topic (/forumdisplay.php?fid=15)
+--- Thread: Basic Discussion Thread (/showthread.php?tid=850)
Basic Discussion Thread - Jason - 05-26-2013 04:49 PM
So this thread is for discussing topics, if they lead to arguments, follow these rules.
1. Don't be a dick, be considerate of others and listen to them.
2. Nothing too offensive, if one is uncomfortable, stop discussing the topic.
3. Don't flame someone for their opinion, its what they feel.
4. Don't create topics on certain players deprived on hate (e.g Driman)
I'll start. People are arguing over how some events (best left untold for now) are false by unreliable sources. Discuss.
RE: Basic Discussion Thread - cojack - 05-26-2013 04:52 PM
only deep researches who have the effort to understand the concept of the past and all the people's false interpretations of the event can really say if it is true or false. In most situations they are true such as 9/11, holocaust and people with complete indoctrination powers are trying to persuade otherwise... case closed
RE: Basic Discussion Thread - Jason - 05-26-2013 04:53 PM
(05-26-2013 04:52 PM)cojack Wrote: only deep researches who have the effort to understand the concept of the past and all the people's false interpretations of the event can really say if it is true or false. In most situations they are true such as 9/11, holocaust and people with complete indoctrination powers are trying to persuade otherwise... case closed
But with enough publicly shown evidence that was written in both literature and media, events such as the Holocaust can't be defined as "fake" or "not proven enough". Case reopened.
RE: Basic Discussion Thread - cojack - 05-26-2013 05:01 PM
(05-26-2013 04:53 PM)Jason Wrote:(05-26-2013 04:52 PM)cojack Wrote: only deep researches who have the effort to understand the concept of the past and all the people's false interpretations of the event can really say if it is true or false. In most situations they are true such as 9/11, holocaust and people with complete indoctrination powers are trying to persuade otherwise... case closed
But with enough publicly shown evidence that was written in both literature and media, events such as the Holocaust can't be defined as "fake" or "not proven enough". Case reopened.
That is what i mean by "indoctrination powers" people like the media ect. with the superiority they hold are able to falsely publicize the events with evidence that is never supported by historians or even witnesses. (like people around the event or even affected.)
RE: Basic Discussion Thread - Jason - 05-26-2013 05:06 PM
(05-26-2013 05:01 PM)cojack Wrote:(05-26-2013 04:53 PM)Jason Wrote:(05-26-2013 04:52 PM)cojack Wrote: only deep researches who have the effort to understand the concept of the past and all the people's false interpretations of the event can really say if it is true or false. In most situations they are true such as 9/11, holocaust and people with complete indoctrination powers are trying to persuade otherwise... case closed
But with enough publicly shown evidence that was written in both literature and media, events such as the Holocaust can't be defined as "fake" or "not proven enough". Case reopened.
That is what i mean by "indoctrination powers" people like the media ect. with the superiority they hold are able to falsely publicize the events with evidence that is never supported by historians or even witnesses. (like people around the event or even affected.)
And holocaust survivors with stories of death, fear, and a immortal sign of their experience, being their id tattooed on their wrists, being no sign of reality?
RE: Basic Discussion Thread - Henning B - 05-26-2013 05:37 PM
I like turtles.
RE: Basic Discussion Thread - Jason - 05-26-2013 05:43 PM
(05-26-2013 05:37 PM)Henning B Wrote: I like turtles.God you're so deep. You totally changed my view, thanks for the post man.
RE: Basic Discussion Thread - cojack - 05-26-2013 06:48 PM
(05-26-2013 05:06 PM)Jason Wrote:(05-26-2013 05:01 PM)cojack Wrote:(05-26-2013 04:53 PM)Jason Wrote:(05-26-2013 04:52 PM)cojack Wrote: only deep researches who have the effort to understand the concept of the past and all the people's false interpretations of the event can really say if it is true or false. In most situations they are true such as 9/11, holocaust and people with complete indoctrination powers are trying to persuade otherwise... case closed
But with enough publicly shown evidence that was written in both literature and media, events such as the Holocaust can't be defined as "fake" or "not proven enough". Case reopened.
That is what i mean by "indoctrination powers" people like the media ect. with the superiority they hold are able to falsely publicize the events with evidence that is never supported by historians or even witnesses. (like people around the event or even affected.)
And holocaust survivors with stories of death, fear, and a immortal sign of their experience, being their id tattooed on their wrists, being no sign of reality?
Possibly, but all we know is the public is more interested and persuaded in public views hence when documentaries come out people seem to either support or disagree more even though the event was significant a while back. If you know what i mean?
RE: Basic Discussion Thread - Kornslipkn - 05-26-2013 06:50 PM
Giggity
RE: Basic Discussion Thread - cojack - 05-26-2013 08:27 PM
(05-26-2013 06:50 PM)Kornslipkn Wrote: Giggity
don't want to be very picky here but it's only me and jason trying to get this thread some meaning, and the rest like you sir are just pretty well spamming. :|